Cavitation Wear of Polymers
https://doi.org/10.32864/0202-4977-2025-46-2-165-176
Abstract
The cavitation wear tests of six polymers were carried out. There were polymers of different classes chosen: Teflon, high-density polyethylene, plexiglass, polyamide, polyurethane, epoxy compound K-153. The cavitation attack was executed in mild fresh water, the latter was kept at temperature of 20 ± 3 ℃. The test apparatus was an ultrasonic magnetostrictive device, the frequency and the amplitude of horn butt-end oscillations being equal to about 22 kHz and 28 μm respectively. The polymers samples were in the shape of cylinders. The test surfaces were the sample flat ends, which were ground and polished. The Shore hardness, sound speed and density of the polymers were measured before putting them to test. During the experiments the mass loss and the roughness of the test surfaces were measured and dependences of the mass loss and arithmetical mean deviation of the assessed profile on cavitation attack duration were built. The wear of all the polymers tested occurs with incubation period. In order to avoid the rough error in the determination of the incubation period the latter was evaluated by profilometry. There was the tough-brittle transition indicated on the dependences of the incubation period and wear rate on the cavitation attack duration, and in the tough failure zone the influence of the hardness on the wear resistance is the opposite to that in the brittle failure zone. In both the tough failure zone and the brittle failure zone the cavitation wear resistance goes down as the acoustic impedance increases, however the polymers suffering brittle damage in cavitation attack and ones suffering tough damage form the separate dependences of wear resistance on the acoustic impedance. The acoustic impedance has strong influence on the wear resistance of polymers in the brittle failure zone and weak influence in the tough failure zone. To secure the highest cavitation resistance it is necessary to choose the polymers having the Shore hardness as nearly as possible to the tough-brittle transition, that is the Shore hardness has to be in value from 65 to 70.
About the Authors
Yu. N. TsvetkovRussian Federation
Dvinskaya st., 5/7, Saint-Petersburg 198035
Ya. O. Fiaktistov
Russian Federation
Dvinskaya st., 5/7, Saint-Petersburg 198035
R. N. Larin
Russian Federation
Dvinskaya st., 5/7, Saint-Petersburg 198035
References
1. Kumar Pardeep and Saini R.P. Study of Cavitation in Hydro Turbines – A Review // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. — 2010 (14), 374—383
2. Ahmad A. Refurbishing Damaged Surfaces of Nickel-Aluminum Bronze Propellers: A Robotic Approach Using Gas Metal Arc Welding and Friction Stir Processing // Proc. of 8th International Conf. on Advanced Materials Engineering and Technology (ICAMET 2020) AIP Conf. Proc. — 2021 (2347), no. 1, 020156–1–020156–10. DOI: 10.1063/5.0053484
3. Zhou Yu-Kang, Jiu-Gen He, and Hammitt F.G. Cavitation Erosion of Diesel Engine Wet Cylinder Liners // Wear. — 1982 (76), no. 3, 321—328
4. Hattori S. and Itoh T. Cavitation Erosion Resistance of Plastics // Wear. — 2011 (271), 1103—1108
5. Tsvetkov Y.N., Gorbachenko Y.O. Ispytaniye staley na kavitatsionnoye iznashivaniye s primeneniyem metoda izmereniya profilya poverhnosty // Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov. — 2017 (83), № 7, 54—57 (in Russian)
6. ASTM G32-16 Standard Test Method for Cavitation Erosion Using Vibratory Apparatus. — ASTM International. — 2016
7. Tsvetkov Y.N., Fiaktistov Y.O. Opredeleniye prodolzhitelnosty inkubatsionnogo perioda pri kavitatsionnom iznashivanii metodom profilometrii // Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov. — 2023 (89), № 5, 64—70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2023-89-5-64-70 (in Russian)
8. Tsvetkov Y.N., Fiaktistov Ya.O., and Kudryavzeva Ye.R. Comparative Analysis of Cavitation Wear of Titanium Alloy in Fresh and Sea Water // Journal of Friction and Wear. — 2022 (43), no. 1, 20—26. DOI: 10.3103/S1068366622010123
9. Regel V.R., Slutsker A.I., Tomashevskiy E.E. Kineticheskaya priroda prochnosty tverdyh tel. — M.: Nauka. — 1974 (in Russian)
10. Lu X., Chen Ch., Dong K., Li Z., and Chen J. An Equivalent Method of Jet Impact Loading from Collapsing Near-Wall Acoustic Bubbles: A Preliminary Study // Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. — 2021 (79), 105760. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105760
11. Bowden F.P. and Tabor D. The Friction and Lubrication od Solids. Part II. — London: Oxford Univ. Press. — 1964
12. Garcia G.L., Lopez-Rios V., Espinosa A., et al. Cavitation Resistance of Epoxy-Based Multilayer Coatings: Surface Damage and Crack Growth Kinetics Dur-ing the Incubation Stage // Wear. — 2014 (316), 124—132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2014.04.007
13. Askarov M.A. Kavitatsionnoye iznashivaniye metallov i polimerov. — Tbilissi: Izd-vo Sachota Sakartvelo. — 1973 (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Tsvetkov Yu.N., Fiaktistov Ya.O., Larin R.N. Cavitation Wear of Polymers. Title in english. 2025;46(2):165-176. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32864/0202-4977-2025-46-2-165-176
JATS XML